E L I T S A B A R A M Ó

INNER LANDSCAPES OF SLOW MOTION
Assoc. Prof. SILVIA BORISOVA, PhD
(Institute of Philosophy and Sociology – Bulgarian Academy of Sciences)
about the "Comfort Zone" solo exhibition by Elitsa Baramó (artist, curator):
(Conceptual Space Dom Gallery, Sofia, Bulgaria, October 2026),
a critical study published in the Bulgarian portal for culture, art and society www.kultura.bg, translated from Bulgarian
Right at the threshold of the DOM conceptual space, the visitor is drawn into a challenging play of meanings, signifiers, and stratifications. "Comfort Zone"—the theme of the 22nd solo exhibition by artist Elitsa Baramó—is simultaneously the state in which one withstands the surrounding world and others to preserve oneself, and the locus of the home, which serves as both the point of departure and the sanctuary of personal authenticity.
At first, the arbitrary act of engaging in this play of meanings proves to be the decisive first step toward encountering the conceptual language "Sediment Process," which its creator, Elitsa Baramó, has unfolded and enriched over the course of a decade. "Sediment Process" is the artist’s organic and vibrant philosophy, combining in her works the raw force of the image with the mathematically precise scalpel of the word-thought. This specific painterly language possesses its own visual syntax grounded in linear perspective, rendering the kinetics of the image through cross-sections. For the baseline (cota zero) of her compositions, Elitsa Baramó chooses the figure of the monolithic stone—a metaphor for human existence as a „slow stone sculpture in progress, shaped by personal choices and will—both personal and divine." Revealed in the slow-motion rhythm of their existence, the images find additional valences beyond the visible through the accompanying reflections in text: thus, the metaphysiciated imagery and plasticity acquire a unique material density. The themes across all phases of the „Sediment Process" are thoroughly philosophical and curated by the artist herself, holding multiple symbols and references of an—aptly captured in title by Prof. PhD Krasimir Delchev—"artistically expressed neo-existentialism"[1].
Phase One problematizes the freedom of human will and its boundaries—the point of contact between the human and the divine in „The Architect” ([a] cube contemporary gallery, Sofia, 2018). Phase Two explores the „Shared spaces" of kinetics in painting and cinema as humanly conceived and inhabited dimensions in the eponymous art film from 2020. Phase Three, „Remaining and Passing Landscapes”, examines the subjectivity of perception and the surrounding „landscape" ([a] cube contemporary gallery, Sofia, and Bulgarian Cultural Institute, Budapest, 2021). Phase Four is titled „Guardian Angels” and is logically dedicated to "the theme of expanding consciousness at the expense of formlessness and fear" ([a] cube contemporary gallery, Sofia, 2022). Phase Five, „Vertex”, further develops this self-absorption of the living-thinking and creative consciousness in a pursuit of its best version, its absolute, self-transcendence, possible impossibility, or impossible possibility (Rakursi Gallery, Sofia, 2023). Phase Six, „Almost a Landscape, Time in Action” (2026), problematizes the qualitative metamorphosis of the fleeting moment of sunrise and sunset into infinity, transforming the discrete experience of the flow of light into an all-encompassing sense of eternity.
Thus, „Comfort Zone" emerges as the seventh phase in the unfolding of the "Sediment process"—a concept quietly and meticulously contemplated over the years—of the strange monolithic images in Elitsa Baramó’s painting. These images come alive through an aesthetics of slow motion, gaining relief and depth under the chisel and breath of the word-thought. The comfort zone is interpreted by the artist as negative liberty [3] —the "unlocked door" before which one experiences personal "freedom-from" the anchors of serenity, yet has not yet stepped into the realm of positive liberty, "freedom-to," marked by the choice already made and the ontological responsibility assumed for its realization. According to the artist, defining the comfort zone presupposes self-knowledge, auto-reflection, silencing the fear of the unknown, self-mastery, a playful attitude, an ethical compass, and even „ethical contemplation—being part of the chaos without being noise": a essence-level Stoic imperative of personal authenticity and steadfastness, modernized into an ethical imperative of care for the self, where "the absurd becomes a doorway to new contemplation, an act of resistance against the world’s speed, and empathy—the most radical form of social action." For Søren Kierkegaard, the absurd is the very transition between the ethical and religious stages: the leap from openness to the Other to unanxious existence within the divine Otherness.
"The ultimate boundary of this journey, however, transcends the physical and the social. In its conceptual vector, the project reaches the absolute frame of the ego—the flesh, the body as the primary and final comfort zone," the author shares in her curatorial text. The primary and final comfort zone is the body—as refuge, escape, limitation, and salvation. A comfort zone is also the ontological longing for the objectification and routinization of subjectivity—with all its diverging impulses, from euphoria to exhaustion, and its natural urge to merge with the givenness of the world. This very ontological longing holds the key to touching the breath, the self-aware life, and the pulse of the monolithic „Objects of Thought ”, „Temporal Arrays”, „Angry Statue”, „Maybe Sapiens”, „Pre-Babylonian Awareness” I. & II., and „Creation”... The comfort
zone is, ultimately, the permitted and unrestricted multiplicity of sunrises, „whip-lash gazes", „Phantasms, Unconscious Desires", the „Self-Realization”, or the „ Birth for a New World I., II.” from the „The Froth of Days”.
The "Comfort Zone" exhibition presents a rich retrospective of the preceding phases of the artist's conceptual approach, "Sediment Process," alongside new works created over the last
three years (such as „Strive, Benchmarks“, „Boko-Maru, Chain Reaction”, „Paradox”, „Arena”, „Angry Statue”, „Freestyle nearby the Comfort Zone, Wings Flapping”, „Beyond the Comfort Zone”, among others). Among the 47 exhibited artworks, painting predominates—frequently executed in mixed media across a large- to small-scale formats—arranged in a provocative dialogue with several abstract art objects, paper bas-reliefs breaking the two-dimensional convention of the pictorial surface („Militant Pacifism”, „Pre-Babylonian Awareness” I. & II.), as well as the Giclée print technique, still under-recognized on the local scene („Self-Realization”, „Threshold / Exercise of Freedom”, and „Maybe Sapiens”). It also features authorial texts printed on translucent film—reflections literally hovering in the air and shared with the viewer—alongside the art film „Shared Spaces” and the short documentary „Sediment Process – The Visual Language of Elitsa Baramó”.
A distinct accent within the otherwise predominantly monochrome palette of the exhibition is the art object „Growth Rings on Pages”—a severed piece of a tree trunk cradling an open book worn by reading, rain, and wind, simultaneously cutting through and closing—like an Ouroboros—the ring of annual growth rings. Introduced in this manner, the ecological subtheme adds an extra dimension to the exhibition’s concept: nature—at-one’s-origin—is likewise a comfort zone—being-at-home-with-oneself (pri-sebe si)—and indeed the most fundamental and radical among all listed so far. The artist conceives the return to nature as a shared comfort zone accessible to all, „which inherently contains its own transgression". Contemplation on this side of and beyond the comfort zone is an ethical endeavor within the framework of the ethics of care for the self—a field in ethics developing intensively over the past two decades, wherein humans painfully realize Arthur Rimbaud’s insight, „I is another" (Je est un autre), while longing for wholeness within one’s living-creation.
This ethical endeavor, thematized in Elitsa Baramó’s exhibition, is complemented by two other remarkable aspects rarely encountered within the local conceptual art scene: the thematic exploration of spatiotemporal dimensions (quite directly showcased in works such as „Temporal Arrays”, „Chronotopos N. (The Living Skull)”, „Chronotopos LXX”, „Chronotopos CCX (Turn)”) and the specific introduction of kinetics, movement, and time into painting—an art form traditionally spatial; alongside the dialectic of deliberated imagery escalating across all phases of the „Sediment Process" project—from the artist’s initial focus on the conflict of differences and the balancing act of conflict points to a mature insight into dialectics as a singular principle and equilibrium underlying all divergent continuations, opposites, and nuances.
"The slowing down of time has deeper foundations than commonly thought. It signifies a transition of the transient, an insight into intervals, an expansion of the moment, an entry into kairos [4] or Augenblick (Moment). Slowing down is an effort to depart from chronos—the numerical and mechanical flow of time—in order to suspend duration and transition toward the 'great time' of 'grand narratives' [2]. Penetrating the codes of spacetime is simultaneously an existential and artistic gesture that reveals vast inner landscapes: an invitation to dive deep into the aesthetics of slow motion, to speak the conceptual language of the "Sediment Process" with anyone who dares to welcome it into one’s personal comfort zone.
------------------------
[1] Delchev, K. 2018. The Existential Symbols in the Paintings of Baramó: Baramó/CriticalContribution
[2] Penev, G. 2022. Toward the Aesthetic Markers of Walking and Social Rhythms. Philosophical Alternatives, 3 (54–63): p. 63.
[3] Curatorial text, Elitsa Baramó, she draws upon Isaiah Berlin's classical distinction (Berlin, I. "Two Concepts of Liberty", 1958) between "negative liberty" ("freedom-from" external interference) and "positive liberty" ("freedom-to" achieve autonomous choice). The artist interprets this division through the critical framework of Charles Taylor (Taylor, C. "What's Wrong with Negative Liberty", 1979), who conceptualizes negative liberty as an "opportunity concept" (the "unlocked door") and positive liberty as an "exercise concept" (stepping over the threshold and assuming ontological responsibility).
[4] Kairos (Gr. καιρός) – in ancient Greek philosophy and the conceptualization of time, kairos denotes qualitative, condensed time; the "opportune or ripe moment" that pierces through numerical, mechanical time (chronos), opening a space for deep contemplation, self-reflection, and ontological choice.